| 1 |
Look at the numbers – They are 3‑digit codes. |
|
| 2 |
Test a simple rule – Maybe “sum of the digits”? |
|
| 3 |
Sum digits of 125 → 1+2+5 = 8 (not 12). So not sum. |
|
| 4 |
Try “difference between first and last digit”? 5‑1 = 4 (not 12). |
|
| 5 |
Notice that the decoded number is close to the sum of the two outer digits: 1+5 = 6; 6+? = 12 → add 6. |
|
| 6 |
Check 379: 3+9 = 12; 12+? = 16 → add 4. |
|
| 7 |
The added value seems to be the middle digit (2→? no). |
|
| 8 |
Instead, try “(first digit × last digit) + middle digit”?** 1×5 = 5; 5+2 = 7 (not 12).** |
|
| 9 |
Re‑evaluate: maybe the rule is “(first digit × last digit) + (second digit × 2)”? 1×5=5; 2×2=4; 5+4=9 (no). |
|
| 10 |
Pattern emerges: 12 = 1+2+5 + 4; 16 = 3+7+9 + 1; 20 = 2+4+6 + 8. The added value seems to be half of the sum of digits? 1+2+5=8; half=4 → 8+4=12. 3+7+9=19; half≈9.5 (not integer). |
|
| 11 |
Try “sum of digits + product of digits”: 1+2+5=8; 1×2×5=10; 8+10=18 (not 12). |
|
| 12 |
Look at the decoded numbers: 12, 16, 20 – they are all even and increase by 4 each time. Maybe the decoding rule is “sum of digits × 2”? 1+2+5=8; 8×? = 12 → ×1.5 (not integer). |
|
| 13 |
New idea – Maybe the rule is “(first digit + last digit) × middle digit”? 1+5=6; 6×2=12 ✔️. 3+9=12; 12×?=16 → 12×1.333… (no). |
|
| 14 |
Check another rule – “(first digit + last digit) × (middle digit ÷ something)”. |
|
| 15 |
Instead of inventing, test simple arithmetic on the whole code: 125 ÷ 12 ≈ 10.416; 379 ÷ 16 ≈ 23.687; 246 ÷ 20 = 12.3. No pattern. |
|
| 16 |
Try mapping to letters: 125 → 12 → L? 379 → 16 → P? 246 → 20 → T? The decoded numbers 12, 16, 20 correspond to letters L, P, T. Are these letters related? They are 4 letters apart. 12→L, 16→P, 20→T (difference +4). So maybe the decoded number is the alphabet position of a letter that is 4 letters ahead of the first digit? 1→E (5), 3→G (7), 2→F (6) – no. |
|
| 17 |
Switch approach – maybe the rule is “(sum of first two digits) + (sum of last two digits) / 2”? 1+ |
|