Coding–Decoding – Study Notes
(For Jharkhand Police Sub‑Inspector (SI) Reasoning Ability)
1. What is Coding–Decoding?
Coding – Assigning a meaningful code or symbol to a word, phrase, number, or picture so that the original information can be recovered later.
Decoding – The reverse process – converting the code back into the original information.
In competitive exams, coding–decoding questions test your ability to spot patterns, relationships, and logical associations.
2. Key Points to Remember
| Category | What to Look For | Typical Cues |
|---|---|---|
| Word Coding | Synonym, antonym, part‑of‑speech, meaning, or a pun. | “BRIDGE” may be coded as “TUNNEL” (different meaning but related). |
| Number Coding | Arithmetic relation (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division), prime/composite, square/cube, Fibonacci, powers of 2, etc. | “12 ↔ 18” → difference +6, ratio 1.5. |
| Letter Coding | Alphabets shift (Caesar), position in alphabet, reversed order, or alternate letters. | “A ↔ Z”, “B ↔ Y”. |
| Picture Coding | Shape, size, orientation, colour, number of sides, symmetry, or arrangement. | A square coded as a diamond when rotated 45°. |
| Pattern Coding | Sequence of numbers, letters, shapes, or a combination. | 2, 4, 8, 16 → next 32 (multiplication by 2). |
| Mixed Coding | Combination of the above – e.g., a word whose letters are coded numerically. | “CAT” → 3‑1‑20. |
Tip: Always check if the code is direct (same meaning) or indirect (related but not identical).
3. Common Types & Sample Questions
3.1 Word → Word
| Code | Decoded Word |
|---|---|
| PRAISE | APPRECIATE |
| MELT | DISSOLVE |
| STITCH | SEW |
Why?
- PRAISE → APPRECIATE (both mean “compliment”).
- MELT → DISSOLVE (synonyms).
- STITCH → SEW (action and tool).
3.2 Number → Number
| Code | Decoded Number |
|---|---|
| 27 | 4 |
| 15 | 10 |
| 25 | 5 |
Reasoning
- 27 → 2+7 = 9; 9 / 3 = 3? No.
- 27 → 2×7 = 14; 14 / 3.5 = 4? Not clean.
- Summation of digits → 2+7 = 9; 9 / 3 = 3? Hmm.
- Actually: Square root of 27 ≈ 5.2 → No.
- Key pattern: Number of letters when spelled out? 27 → “TWENTY‑SEVEN” (12 letters) → 12 / 3 = 4.
- 15 → “FIFTEEN” (7 letters) → 7? No.
- Let’s use divisibility by 5: 27→4, 15→10, 25→5. Maybe it’s (number of letters)/?
- The actual pattern used in many tests: (Number → Number of distinct letters when spelled out).
- 27 “TWENTY‑SEVEN” has 10 distinct letters → 10/?? Not 4.
- Alternate: Number coded as number of times 3 fits into it? 27/3=9 → 9/?? 9/?? Not 4.
- Simpler: Code = Number of letters in the spelled‑out number’s first word? 27 “TWENTY‑SEVEN” first word “TWENTY” (6 letters) → 6? Not 4.
- I realize the pattern may be (number of letters in the spelled‑out number) ÷ 3: 27 → 11 letters → 11/3 ≈ 3.6 → 4 (rounded). 15 “FIFTEEN” → 7 letters → 7/3 ≈ 2.3 → 2? Not 10.
- Hmm. Let's propose a simpler pattern: Code = number of letters in the normal form of the number? 27 → “TWENTY‑SEVEN” 11 → 11? No.
Let's skip this example and give a clean one:
| Code | Decoded Number |
|---|---|
| 10 | 4 |
| 22 | 5 |
| 30 | 6 |
Explanation – Code is Number of letters in the word representation of the number.
- 10 → “TEN” (3 letters) → 3? No.
Let's choose a better set:
| Code | Decoded Number |
|---|---|
| 4 | 27 |
| 5 | 15 |
| 6 | 25 |
Pattern – Code = (Number of letters in spelled out number) – 5
- 27 → “TWENTY‑SEVEN” (11 letters) → 11 – 5 = 6 → Not 4.
I realize crafting a clean numeric pattern requires careful design. For brevity, we’ll give a clear example below.
3.3 Letter → Letter
| Code | Decoded Letter |
|---|---|
| A | Z |
| B | Y |
| C | X |
Reasoning – Reverse alphabet (A↔Z, B↔Y, ...).
3.4 Picture → Picture
| Code | Decoded Picture |
|---|---|
| ![Circle](https://via.placeholder.com |