Delhi Patwari / Lekhpal /Reasoning Ability

Syllogism

Logical Reasoning · free study notes · Updated

Syllogism – Reasoning Ability

Delhi Patwari / Lekhpal – Examination Guide


1. What is a Syllogism?

A syllogism is a form of logical reasoning that uses two (or more) premises to arrive at a conclusion.

  • Premise 1 (Major Premise) – a general statement.
  • Premise 2 (Minor Premise) – a specific statement that falls under the general category.
  • Conclusion – a logical inference that follows necessarily from the two premises.

Example
All mammals are warm‑blooded.
All dogs are mammals.
Therefore, all dogs are warm‑blooded.


2. Key Characteristics

Feature Description
Logical Validity Conclusion must necessarily follow from premises.
Logical Soundness Premises must be true and the reasoning valid.
Categories C – universal affirmative; D – universal negative; E – particular affirmative; I – particular negative.
Quantifiers All, Some, No, None
Quality Affirmative vs Negative
Quantity Universal vs Particular

3. Types of Syllogisms (by form)

Symbol Form Example
AA‑1 All A are B. All B are C. → All A are C. All birds are animals. All animals are living beings. → All birds are living beings.
AE‑1 All A are B. Some B are not C. All cars are vehicles. Some vehicles are not electric.
EA‑1 Some A are B. All B are C. Some fruits are apples. All apples are sweet.
EE‑1 Some A are B. Some A are not C. Some birds can fly. Some birds cannot fly.
OI‑1 No A are B. Some C are A. No reptiles are mammals. Some animals are reptiles.
OI‑2 No A are B. Some C are B. No birds are mammals. Some pets are birds.
II‑1 Some A are B. Some A are not C. Some students are athletes. Some students are not athletes.
II‑2 Some A are B. Some C are not B. Some flowers are roses. Some plants are not roses.

Note: The above table shows the most common forms. In exams you might encounter variations, but the core logic remains the same.


4. How to Solve a Syllogism

  1. Identify the Premises
    • Label them as Major and Minor (or First and Second).
  2. Determine the Type
    • Check the quantifier (All / Some / No) and the quality (Affirmative / Negative).
  3. Apply the Rules
    • Use the standard syllogistic rules (e.g., Major Premise determines the Conclusion’s subject, Minor Premise determines the Conclusion’s predicate).
  4. Check for Validity
    • Make sure the conclusion logically follows.
    • Verify No contradictions (e.g., “All A are B” and “No B are C” cannot both be true if an A exists that is also a C).

Quick Reference Rules

Rule What It Means
Rule of Quantity If the conclusion is universal, at least one premise must be universal.
Rule of Quality If the conclusion is negative, at least one premise must be negative.
Rule of Distribution The conclusion cannot refer to a term that was undetermined (undistributed) in both premises.
Rule of Subalternation From a universal premise you can infer a particular one, but not vice versa.

5. Worked Example

Premise 1: All A are B.
Premise 2: No B are C.
Conclusion: All A are not C.

Step‑by‑Step

Step Action Reason
1 Label the premises 1 = Major, 2 = Minor
2 Identify quantifiers & quality Premise 1 = Universal affirmative (All A are B). Premise 2 = Universal negative (No B are C).
3 Apply the Rule of Quantity Conclusion must be universal (cannot be particular).
4 Apply the Rule of Quality Since at least one premise is negative, conclusion may be negative.
5 Check distribution In Premise 1, “B” is distributed (All B). In Premise 2, “B” is also distributed. The term “B” is fully distributed in both premises, so the conclusion “All A are not C” is valid.
6 Final conclusion All A are not C.

Interpretation: If every A is a B, and no B is a C, then indeed no A can be a C.


6. Common Pitfalls

Mistake Why It Happens How to Avoid
Confusing the order Mixing up which premise is major/minor Write them in order and keep track of subject/predicate
Ignoring distribution Forgetting that all and no distribute the predicate Check distribution after each premise
Assuming truth of premises Validity ≠ Soundness Treat premises as given; only check logical flow
Choosing wrong conclusion type Picking a particular conclusion when the premises are universal Apply the Rule of Quantity first
Over‑generalising Assuming a particular conclusion from a universal premise Remember subalternation goes one way only

7. Quick Revision Summary

  • Syllogism = 2 premises + 1

Your note

Page 1

Doubt hai is topic me?

Free AI teacher se poocho — 24/7, step by step.