Statement & conclusion

Logical Reasoning · free study notes

Study Notes – Statement & Conclusion

(Reasoning Ability – J&K Police SI Exam)

Goal: Master the art of extracting valid conclusions from a set of given statements and recognise when a conclusion is True, False or Undetermined.
Exam‑style: Multiple statements (4–6) + multiple conclusions (5–6). Pick the correct conclusions (single or multiple).


1. What is a Statement & Conclusion?

Term Meaning
Statement A premise or a fact that is given (e.g., “All dogs are mammals”).
Conclusion A deduction that follows from the statements (e.g., “If X is a dog, then X is a mammal”).
Inference The logical connection between statements and conclusion.

Key point:

  • A conclusion is valid only if it follows necessarily from all the statements.
  • It may be True, False or Undetermined (cannot be decided from the given data).

2. Logical Language & Symbols

Symbol Meaning Example
∧ AND P ∧ Q → both P and Q are true
∨ OR P ∨ Q → at least one of P or Q is true
¬ NOT ¬P → P is false
→ IF … THEN P → Q
↔ IF AND ONLY IF P ↔ Q
∀ FOR ALL ∀x (P(x))
∃ THERE EXISTS ∃x (P(x))

Practice tip: Convert every given sentence into symbolic form before drawing conclusions.


3. Basic Truth Tables

P Q P ∧ Q P ∨ Q P → Q ¬P
T T T T T F
T F F T F F
F T F T T T
F F F F T T
  • Derived rules:
    • Contrapositive: (P → Q) ≡ (¬Q → ¬P).
    • De Morgan: ¬(P ∧ Q) ≡ (¬P ∨ ¬Q); ¬(P ∨ Q) ≡ (¬P ∧ ¬Q).

4. Types of Inference

Type Description Example
Deduction From general to specific All A are B. C is A. → C is B.
Induction From specific to general 3/4 of sampled people drink tea. → Most people drink tea.
Abduction From effect to probable cause Stairs are wet → it rained.
Transposition Switching antecedent and consequent (contrapositive) If it rains, the ground gets wet → If the ground is not wet, it did not rain.

Exam tip: Most “Statement & Conclusion” questions use deduction.


5. Rules of Inference (Commonly Tested)

Rule Symbolic Form What it Does
Modus Ponens P → Q, P ⊢ Q If P then Q; P is true → Q is true.
Modus Tollens P → Q, ¬Q ⊢ ¬P If P then Q; Q is false → P is false.
Hypothetical Syllogism P → Q, Q → R ⊢ P → R Chain of implications.
Disjunctive Syllogism P ∨ Q, ¬P ⊢ Q One of P or Q; P is false → Q is true.
Addition P ⊢ P ∨ Q From P, we can add any disjunction.
Simplification P ∧ Q ⊢ P From conjunction, take any part.
Conjunction P, Q ⊢ P ∧ Q Combine two true statements.
Resolution (P ∨ Q), (¬P ∨ R) ⊢ Q ∨ R Classic rule in propositional logic.

6. Structured Approach to a “Statement & Conclusion” Question

Your note

Page 1

Doubt hai is topic me?

Free AI teacher se poocho — 24/7, step by step.