Civil Judge Exam /Reasoning Ability

Syllogism

Logical Reasoning · free study notes · Updated

Syllogism – Study Notes

Subject: Reasoning Ability
Exam: Civil Judge (Central & State)
Format: Multiple‑choice / True‑/False / Fill‑in‑the‑blank


1. Simple Explanation

A syllogism is a deductive reasoning pattern that uses two premises to arrive at a conclusion.
It is like a short “if‑then” chain of logic.

Term Meaning
Premise A statement that is assumed to be true.
Conclusion The logical result that follows from the premises.
Premise 1 (P1) The first premise.
Premise 2 (P2) The second premise.
Conclusion (C) The statement that logically follows.

General structure:

P1: All A are B.
P2: All C are A.
C: Therefore, all C are B.

Syllogisms are tested in propositional (simple) and categorical (with quantifiers) forms.


2. Key Points to Remember

# Point Why It Matters
1 Quantifiers All/No/Some determine the type of syllogism (A, E, I, O).
2 Form 4‑letter code (e.g., AAA‑1) indicates the form & figure.
3 Figure The arrangement of the middle term (M) in P1 & P2 (4 figures).
4 Validity Rules 1) Middle term must be distributed once. 2) Contradictory or exclusive premises invalid. 3) If premise is negative, conclusion must be negative.
5 Distribution A term is distributed if it refers to all members of its class.
6 Common Error Confusing universal vs particular conclusions.
7 Shortcuts • Check if conclusion is universal or particular.
• Verify distribution of middle term.
8 Practice Solve 5–10 problems a day; focus on all 4 figures.

Quick Reference Table – 4 Figures (All Positive Premises)

Figure P1 P2 Conclusion
1 M → P S → M S → P
2 P → M S → M S → P
3 M → P M → S S → P
4 P → M M → S S → P

(M = Middle Term, P = Predicate, S = Subject)


3. Worked Example

Question

All architects are designers.
Some managers are architects.
Conclusion: Some managers are designers.
Is the conclusion true?

Step‑by‑Step

  1. Identify terms

    • M (Middle term) = architect
    • P (Predicate) = designer
    • S (Subject) = manager
  2. Translate premises

    • P1: All M are P → All architects → designers.
    • P2: Some S are M → Some managers → architects.
  3. Check validity rules

    • Rule 1 – Distributive Middle Term
      • Middle term M is not distributed in either premise (neither “All” nor “No” applies to it).
      • Violation → Syllogism invalid.
  4. Conclusion

    • Since the syllogism is invalid, the conclusion cannot be guaranteed.
    • The answer: False / Not necessarily true.

Quick Verdict

Conclusion is FALSE (the syllogism is invalid due to non‑distributed middle term).


4. Common Syllogism Patterns (A‑E‑I‑O)

Pattern Premise 1 Premise 2 Conclusion
A (Universal affirmative) All A are B All C are A All C are B
E (Universal negative) No A are B All C are A No C are B
I (Particular affirmative) Some A are B All C are A Some C are B
O (Particular negative) No A are B Some C are A No C are B

Tip:

  • If both premises are positive → conclusion must be positive.
  • If one premise is negative → conclusion must be negative.

5. Quick Revision Summary

Section What to Check
1. Identify Terms S, M, P
2. Determine Quantifiers All / No / Some
3. Figure 1, 2, 3, or 4
4. Distribution Is M distributed in P1 & P2?
5. Validity Rules
• Middle term distributed at least once.
• Negative premise → negative conclusion.
• Contradictory premises → invalid.
6. Conclusion Type Universal vs Particular
7. Practice 10+ questions per figure daily

6. Quick Practice Questions (Answer Key)

# Question Answer
1 All A are B. Some C are A. Therefore, Some C are B. True
2 No A are B. All C are A. Therefore, No C are B. True
3 Some A are B. All C are A. Therefore, Some C are B. True
4 All A are B. No C are A. Therefore, No C are B. True
5 Some A are B. Some C are A. Therefore, Some C are B. Cannot be determined
6 No A are B. Some C are A. Therefore, No C are B. Cannot be determined
7 All A are B. Some

Your note

Page 1

Doubt hai is topic me?

Free AI teacher se poocho — 24/7, step by step.